Compare retail offers on your plant’s actual load
When your contract is up for renewal, or a retailer has tabled a new offer, headline rates don’t tell the full story. A lower energy rate can hide a costlier shift in TOU periods or demand charges. The simulation tests each offer against your real operation, including the best the plant can achieve under it.
Measured against what is possible, not just the historic load profile
Each offer is analysed on what the plant can achieve under it: the lowest energy cost that structure allows, not how the plant has historically operated and used energy.
Compare offers like-for-like
Every cost component counted: energy volume, demand, network, TOU. Each evaluated at the best its structure allows. Tested for sensitivity to operating changes and future tariff shifts.
Recommendation you can put to governance
A clear recommendation, the annual cost difference to your current arrangement, and sensitivity. If no offer beats your current position, that is the answer. No change is made.
The contract stays between you and your retailer
Delprosa is not party to it and does not negotiate on your behalf: we provide the quantified basis to make the decision. See How We Work for how offers are assessed and re-run before you sign.
The first step is a plant assessment
It draws on the same validated model used across all Energy Management work, so it can be scoped together with Tariff Optimisation depending on what your site needs first.